For years, growth has been easy to explain: more installs meant more growth, bigger reach meant stronger performance, and scale was the final goal. However, in 2026 that formula feels increasingly incomplete.
Across the mobile landscape, teams are operating under more pressure than ever to prove efficiency, retention, monetization, and long-term business impact. Plain user acquisition is no longer the hardest part, but actually acquiring users who stay, engage, and create value.
Meanwhile, the conversation around “high-quality users” has become more complicated. What does quality mean? Is it simply retention? Higher spend? Better engagement? More predictable behavior? And does focusing on quality automatically mean sacrificing scale?
To explore how this thinking is evolving, we asked three experts one question: What separates high-quality users from high-volume users in 2026?


User quality is no longer one metric

User acquisition has long been optimized around volume-first metrics, like installs, CPIs, and short-term conversion efficiency. Although those metrics are still relevant, they are increasingly becoming starting points rather than final outcomes.
Today, growth teams are looking deeper into the user journey and asking different questions:


For María de la Puente, founder of Hubapps, answering those questions starts with understanding how different acquisition approaches translate into long-term user value:
What happens after acquisition?
Which users become active?
Which users return?
Which users continue generating value over time?


New Challenges,
New Measurement Approaches
As mobile advertising has evolved, so have the tools and frameworks used to evaluate acquisition performance. Privacy changes, platform developments, and advances in machine learning have all influenced how marketers assess user value and campaign success.




Rethinking the Relationship
Between Scale and Performance
Growth teams are often under pressure to expand reach while maintaining strong business outcomes. As acquisition strategies mature, many marketers are reassessing how they balance efficiency, retention, engagement, and growth objectives.
The discussion doesn't stop at measurement, however. It also affects how teams approach growth itself:
“Nowadays, the industry understands that volume and quality aren’t opposite, but quality has to be an anchor and there are different ways to get it from using creatives and signaling to teach the algorithms what is a value user for in each campaign, to work with different reward systems when working with rewarded apps”.


Virendra Shekhawat, Growth Manager at AppAgent, agrees that user quality cannot be measured by acquisition metrics alone, but argues that another factor is often overlooked: whether those users remain valuable once campaigns begin to scale.



Precision is becoming
the competitive advantage

Long-term value takes time, but acquisition decisions cannot wait indefinitely. As a result, advertisers are increasingly looking for ways to identify quality earlier and more accurately.


Summer Liu, CMO at SocialPeta, believes this reflects a broader shift in how the industry defines successful growth:




Final thoughts
Although each expert approaches the question from a different angle, a common theme emerges: user quality is increasingly defined by long-term value rather than acquisition volume alone.
For María, that means focusing on what happens after the install.
For Virendra, it means validating that quality under real scaling conditions.
For Summer, it means shifting from acquisition at scale to acquisition with precision.
The strongest growth teams in 2026 may not be the ones acquiring the most users. They may be the ones best equipped to identify, measure, and retain the users who continue creating value long after acquisition.

