CPI vs CPA in a Post-ATT World: Smarter Strategies for iOS Growth

Apple’s App Tracking Transparency (ATT) framework has reshaped mobile user acquisition (UA). Marketers can no longer rely on the same precision targeting or deterministic attribution they once enjoyed. This shift makes the choice between CPI (Cost Per Install) and CPA (Cost Per Action) models more critical than ever for driving profitable growth.

In this article, we’ll break down CPI vs CPA in the context of iOS, explore the trade-offs, and share strategies to help you scale smarter in 2025.

What is CPI?

CPI (Cost Per Install) is one of the simplest and most widely used pricing models in mobile advertising. Advertisers pay a fixed price every time a user installs their app.

• Pros:

  • Predictable costs, easy to measure.

  • Great for scaling fast and boosting rankings in app stores.

  • Works well when you need to fill the funnel with new users.

• Cons:

  • No guarantee of user quality or monetization.

  • Can lead to wasted spend on low-LTV installs.

  • Harder to evaluate ROI post-ATT without strong SKAN data modeling.
    

What is CPA?

CPA (Cost Per Action) shifts the focus from installs to specific in-app actions — for example, completing a tutorial, reaching level 5, or making the first purchase. Advertisers pay only when users perform the desired event.

• Pros:

  • Aligns cost directly with engagement or revenue.

  • Reduces risk of paying for non-monetizing users.

  • Helps maximize ROAS in high-value verticals like midcore or strategy games.

• Cons:

  • Smaller scale compared to CPI.

  • Higher upfront costs per user.

  • Attribution challenges under ATT can complicate optimization.
    

CPI vs CPA in the Post-ATT Era

The privacy-driven changes of ATT and SKAdNetwork (SKAN) have forced UA managers to rethink efficiency:

• CPI campaigns still shine when you need volume and visibility, but the lack of granular targeting makes it harder to filter for quality users.

• CPA campaigns are better for long-term profitability, but they rely heavily on modeled data, predictive analytics, or probabilistic measurement to work at scale.

  
  

In short: CPI brings installs, CPA brings intent — and the right balance depends on your game genre, monetization model, and budget flexibility.

When to Use CPI

• Soft launch or new market entry → Gather quick user data.

• Casual/hypercasual games → High scale, ad-monetization driven.

• ASO boost campaigns → To climb app store charts fast.
  

When to Use CPA

• Midcore/hardcore games → Higher LTV users matter more than raw installs.

• In-app purchase–driven monetization → Focus on events tied to spend.

• Post-ATT growth strategies → To reduce wasted budget and improve ROAS.
  

Smarter Strategies for iOS Growth

To get the most out of CPI and CPA in a post-ATT world:

1. Run CPI and CPA in parallel – Use CPI for top-of-funnel volume, while layering CPA for monetization efficiency.

2. Leverage predictive models – Use early signals (session length, tutorial completion) as CPA goals when direct purchase data isn’t available due to SKAN delays.

3. Test rewarded UA channels – Rewarded traffic often delivers stronger engagement, making CPA more efficient.

4. Optimize creative for ATT – With less targeting, creative testing becomes your biggest lever for both CPI and CPA.

5. Double down on first-party data – Build user cohorts with your own analytics to guide which model is delivering real value.
   

CPI vs CPA: Which Wins in 2025?

There isn’t a one-size-fits-all answer. CPI is still useful for scaling installs and boosting visibility, but CPA is better aligned with profitability under ATT.

The smartest UA teams are blending both models — using CPI to keep the funnel full, while leaning on CPA to ensure that budgets are tied to actual business outcomes.

FAQs (SEO-friendly)

Q: What’s the main difference between CPI and CPA?

CPI charges per install, while CPA charges when a user completes a specific action inside the app.

Q: Which is better after ATT?

CPA generally provides more ROI post-ATT since it ties spend to value, though CPI remains useful for scale and testing.

Q: Is CPI cheaper than CPA?

Usually yes, but CPA delivers higher-quality users, making it more cost-efficient long term.

Looking to boost your game's user acquisition?

Utilize a self-serve dashboard to easily and effectively enhance your UA efforts. These user-friendly dashboards give you complete control over your budget and offer extensive targeting options, making it a smart choice for elevating your game's reach.

Gamelight’s advertising platform is a leading mobile marketing solution equipped with an intuitive self-serve dashboard. Operating on a CPI basis, it drives direct traffic from a self-published mobile game recommendation platform. Moreover, you can set up your account and launch your first campaign in just 5 minutes!

Try the self-serve dashboard of the Gamelight advertising platform.

If you need help, fill in THIS FORM and one of our team members will get back to you within 24 hours.