top of page

Gamelight Research: How Game Studios Can Increase Advertising Yield

  • Writer: Fátima Castro Franco
    Fátima Castro Franco
  • 4 days ago
  • 6 min read

Advertising has become a significant part of the mobile gaming business model, particularly for games that combine ad revenue with in-app purchases. But as competition for players and advertiser demand continue to evolve, simply increasing the number of impressions is unlikely to be the best path to higher revenue.


For game studios, advertising yield optimization is about getting more value from the players and inventory they already have. Ad format, placement, frequency, player quality, geography, and retention can all influence how much revenue a game ultimately generates from advertising.


In this Gamelight Research report, we examine the key factors behind mobile game advertising revenue and the strategies studios can use to improve advertising yield while protecting the player experience.


What Is Advertising Yield in Mobile Gaming?


Advertising yield describes how effectively a game turns its available advertising opportunities into revenue.


Several metrics can help publishers understand mobile advertising performance:

Metric

What it tells publishers

eCPM

Revenue generated per 1,000 ad impressions

Fill rate

Percentage of available ad inventory that gets monetized

ARPDAU

Average revenue generated per daily active user

Ad impressions per user

How frequently players are exposed to advertising

Completion rate

How often users complete rewarded ads

Ad LTV

Advertising revenue generated throughout the player's lifecycle

No single metric tells the whole story.


A game might have a strong eCPM but generate relatively little total advertising revenue if players don't stay long enough to create many monetization opportunities. Likewise, increasing impressions can raise short-term revenue while damaging retention.


That's why advertising yield optimization should focus on the overall economics of the player, rather than maximizing individual ad metrics.


Better Advertising Starts With Better Players


One of the most overlooked factors in mobile game advertising revenue is user quality.

Advertising monetization doesn't begin when an ad loads. It begins when a player installs the game.


A player who stays for several weeks creates significantly more opportunities for advertising revenue than someone who churns after a few sessions.


For example:


Green infographic comparing low-value vs higher-value acquisition, with install-to-churn and install-to-long-term revenue flows.

This is why publishers should evaluate user acquisition based on more than CPI.


A campaign with a higher acquisition cost can still be more profitable if it delivers players with stronger retention, engagement, and lifetime value (LTV).


The connection between UA and monetization is becoming particularly important as publishers move toward quality-focused growth.


Rewarded Ads Create a Different Kind of Ad Opportunity


Rewarded advertising is one of the strongest tools available to mobile game publishers because it introduces a clear value exchange.


The player chooses to watch an ad and receives something useful in return.


That might be:


  • Extra lives

  • Coins or other virtual currency

  • Energy

  • Boosters

  • Additional attempts

  • Access to content

  • Progression rewards


The format can be particularly effective for monetizing non-paying players.


Instead of generating no direct revenue from a user who doesn't make an in-app purchase, the publisher can create additional monetization opportunities through voluntary advertising.


But the reward needs to be carefully designed. If it's too weak, players won't participate. If it's too generous, it can disrupt the game's economy or reduce the incentive to purchase.


The strongest rewarded ad placements solve a problem the player already has. An extra life after failing a difficult level is naturally more compelling than an unrelated ad appearing in the middle of gameplay.


Placement Can Change the Value of an Impression


Not all ad impressions have equal value. An advertisement shown at the right moment can feel like a useful part of the game experience. The same format shown at the wrong moment can create frustration.


Studios should therefore test placements around natural moments such as:


  • After a failed level

  • When players run out of energy

  • Before claiming a valuable reward

  • Between gameplay sessions

  • During natural progression breaks

  • When players need additional resources


This is particularly relevant for rewarded video advertising, where player intent directly affects engagement.


The objective isn't to find the maximum number of places where an ad can appear.

It's to identify the moments when the player is most likely to see the exchange as worthwhile.


The Frequency Trap


More advertising exposure can generate more impressions. That doesn't necessarily mean more long-term revenue. Increasing ad frequency can affect:


Ad revenue ↑


but potentially also:


Retention ↓

Session length ↓

IAP revenue ↓

Churn ↑


This is why publishers should evaluate changes to ad frequency against total player value.


A/B testing different frequencies can reveal where the economic sweet spot sits. One group might see fewer ads, another moderate exposure, and another more frequent placements.


The important comparison isn't simply which group generates the most ad revenue. It's which group generates the strongest combination of:


Advertising revenue + IAP revenue + retention + LTV


That is a much more useful measure of advertising performance.


Advertising Yield Varies by Market


Geography is another major factor in mobile game advertising revenue.


Advertiser demand, competition, user behavior, and available inventory can differ significantly between countries. As a result, the same ad placement can produce very different results across markets.


Publishers expanding internationally should analyze advertising performance by geography instead of relying solely on global averages.


A market with a lower eCPM may still be commercially attractive if:


  • User acquisition costs are lower

  • Retention is stronger

  • Players generate more sessions

  • Advertising engagement is higher

  • Overall LTV is competitive


The key is to evaluate the complete economic picture, rather than optimizing one advertising metric in isolation.


How Monetization Models Work Together


Advertising doesn't have to replace in-app purchases. In fact, hybrid monetization can allow publishers to generate value from different player segments.


Player behavior

Potential monetization strategy

Non-spender

Rewarded advertising

Occasional spender

Ads + IAP

Frequent spender

Primarily IAP

Highly engaged player

Multiple monetization options

A player might watch rewarded ads during regular gameplay but make an in-app purchase when they want something immediately. Another player might never spend money but remain highly engaged with rewarded content.


The opportunity is to create a monetization system where different revenue streams complement each other instead of competing for the same player.


Connecting Acquisition and Monetization


The economics of advertising ultimately depend on the quality and longevity of the audience being monetized. For Gamelight, that makes the connection between acquisition and downstream player value particularly important.


As Günay Azer, founder of Gamelight, explains:


Green quote card with text about advertising yield and revenue, plus a small portrait of a purple-haired woman in the corner

This is particularly relevant for studios evaluating UA channels based on short-term acquisition metrics alone.


The value of an acquired player shouldn't end with the install. Advertising revenue, purchases, retention, and LTV all contribute to the real economics of that acquisition.


What Should Game Studios Measure?


Studios looking to improve advertising yield should create a broader view of monetization performance.


Rather than monitoring ad revenue alone, teams can track:


  • eCPM by ad format and market

  • Fill rate

  • Rewarded ad opt-in and completion rates

  • Ad impressions per DAU

  • Advertising ARPDAU

  • D1, D7, and D30 retention

  • IAP revenue alongside advertising revenue

  • LTV by acquisition source

  • Advertising revenue by player segment


This helps identify whether an optimization is genuinely improving the business.


For example, a new rewarded placement that increases ad revenue while maintaining retention may be a strong opportunity to scale.


A placement that increases impressions but causes players to churn faster is a very different story.


A More Valuable Way to Think About Advertising Yield


The goal of mobile advertising isn't to extract the maximum possible number of impressions from every player. It's to maximize the long-term value generated by the advertising experience.


That requires studios to look at the entire chain:


Green infographic showing user growth flow: Quality acquisition, Engagement, Ad interaction, Monetization, Retention, LTV.

When these elements work together, advertising can become a much more effective revenue driver without requiring publishers to overwhelm players with ads.


For studios, the biggest gains may come from relatively small improvements across several areas: acquiring better users, finding stronger rewarded placements, optimizing frequency, understanding regional economics, and measuring advertising alongside the rest of the player lifecycle.


Frequently Asked Questions


  1. How can game studios increase advertising yield?

Game studios can increase advertising yield by improving ad placements, optimizing rewarded video, testing ad frequency, improving fill rates, analyzing performance by market, and acquiring users with stronger engagement and retention.


  1. What is the best ad format for mobile games?

There is no single best format for every game. Rewarded video can be particularly effective because users voluntarily engage in exchange for an in-game reward, while interstitials and banners can serve different monetization purposes.


  1. Do rewarded ads increase mobile game revenue?

Rewarded ads can create additional revenue by monetizing players who may not make in-app purchases. Their effectiveness depends on reward design, placement, frequency, player engagement, and advertising demand.


  1. How does user acquisition affect advertising revenue?

High-quality users who retain longer and play more frequently create more opportunities to generate advertising revenue. This means acquisition channels should be evaluated based on downstream LTV rather than CPI alone.


  1. Can too many ads hurt mobile game revenue?

Yes. Excessive advertising can negatively affect retention, session length, player satisfaction, and IAP revenue. Publishers should optimize for total player value rather than maximizing ad impressions.


Improve Advertising Revenue Through Higher-Quality Acquisition

Want to see how Gamelight can help you acquire engaged players with stronger long-term value? Get in touch with our team.

Comments


  • LinkedIn

© Gamelight

bottom of page